In our previous blog post from February 2025, we discussed how new U.S. tariffs on Chinese, Mexican, and Canadian imports were already reshaping the spice trade, raising import costs and forcing many distributors to reconsider sourcing strategies.
Now, only months later, the situation has escalated dramatically. President Donald Trump has threatened to impose 100 % tariffs on all Chinese goods beginning November 1, a move that could multiply the pressure we described earlier and reshape global trade flows once again.
Beijing’s Reaction: Warning Without Immediate Retaliation
China’s official response was swift and firm. The Ministry of Commerce dismissed the U.S. tariff threat as a “wilful threat of high tariffs” that undermines the spirit of negotiation. It defended China’s decision to restrict exports of certain rare earths and advanced technologies—arguing these are legitimate national security measures, not retaliation. Chinese officials accused Washington of double standards, noting that the U.S. has already blacklisted Chinese firms and imposed port fees on China-linked vessels.
China’s Foreign Ministry echoed the message: the U.S. must reverse course, or Beijing will be forced to act in defense of its interests. As the Foreign Ministry spokesperson put it, “If the United States insists on its own way, China will resolutely take retaliatory measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests.” While the rhetoric is sharp, China has not yet announced specific counter-tariff measures. That restraint suggests Beijing is leaving some room for diplomatic maneuvering.
Analysts interpret China’s tone as a strategic balance: signaling readiness to escalate, but preserving flexibility for a negotiated solution.
America’s Position: Threat, Then Softening
Trump’s tariff escalation followed Beijing’s sudden export curbs on rare-earth minerals—key to technologies from semiconductors to electric motors. In striking back, Trump labeled China’s move “hostile” and said he might even cancel an upcoming meeting with Xi Jinping.
However, over the weekend, the tone softened. Trump posted on Truth Social: “Don’t worry about China, it will all be fine! Highly respected President Xi just had a bad moment…” He framed the tariff threat more as leverage than an irrevocable step. Meanwhile, Vice President J.D. Vance and other administration figures doubled down: they warned China not to respond aggressively and insisted that the U.S. held stronger cards.
The White House also quietly sought to reestablish communication. Its Trade Representative said it had attempted outreach with Beijing following China’s recent export controls—but received only deferral.
Global and Market Reactions
The tariff drama rattled global markets. On the day Trump’s announcement broke, major U.S. stock indexes plunged by nearly 2 %, erasing trillions in paper value. Technology firms, reliant on Chinese supply chains and access to critical minerals, were among the hardest hit.
U.S. retailers, already operating in a fragile environment, are bracing themselves. The holiday shopping season nears, and the threat of doubling import costs has sparked fears about higher prices, lower consumer demand, and supply chain disruption. Some firms may rush to import goods ahead of the deadline; others might delay orders or shift sourcing altogether. Either way, uncertainty looms large.
Trade and industry groups have warned that the buildup of tariffs, export controls, and countermeasures could destabilize cross-Pacific trade on a much broader scale. Many analysts now see this moment as a critical test: whether the two sides can still negotiate their way back from the brink.
What’s at Stake: Economics and Strategy
Inflation, Growth, and Corporate Margins
A 100 % tariff would essentially double the cost of Chinese goods entering the U.S. That could feed inflation, depress consumer spending, and squeeze corporate margins, especially for firms that rely heavily on Chinese components. Some may absorb losses; others may pass those costs to customers, further slowing demand.
In China, weaker export demand and uncertainty could weigh on business investment. The larger risk is that firms delay or cancel capital expenditure amid an unstable trade environment.
The Strategic Dimension
This clash goes beyond economics. It’s also about leverage and technological dominance. The U.S. wields tariffs and export controls; China holds dominance over critical minerals and the infrastructure to process them. Analysts note that each side may expect the other to crack first.
China’s choice not to retaliate immediately—at least not yet—could be interpreted as an opening for dialogue. But Beijing has made clear it is prepared to act. The coming weeks, especially around a potential Xi–Trump meeting, will likely determine whether this confrontation escalates or retreats.
Why Spice Importers in the U.S. Should Watch Closely
One industry that might not seem obviously threatened by a U.S.–China tariff standoff is the spice trade. But in fact, the effects could be meaningful—especially for importers sourcing Chinese-origin spices such as garlic, ginger, star anise, and chili products.
Rising Costs for Chinese-Origin Spices
Under existing tariff policies in 2025, spices from China already face stiff import duties. Some importers report cost increases of 15–20 % for products like garlic and ginger. When costs are pushed higher, margins shrink or prices must rise.
The leap to 100 % tariffs would deepen that burden. A spice imported for $1.00 might suddenly face $1.00 in duties, doubling the cost before any domestic markups. For food manufacturers and retailers that depend on Chinese spice inputs, that spells higher ingredient bills and potential price increases for consumers.
Supply Chain Reconfiguration and Substitution
Facing sharply higher import costs, many U.S. spice importers may scramble to find alternative suppliers. Indian, Egyptian, Peruvian, or Mexican spice producers might benefit from diverted demand. But the switch is not always seamless: differences in quality, consistency, shipping logistics, and lead times can disrupt supply.
Moreover, sudden shifts in sourcing may strain relationships and contracts, and expose importers to currency or logistical risks.
Uncertainty and Inventory Buildup
To guard against tariff surprises, some importers may front-load spice imports—bringing in larger inventories ahead of deadlines. But that carries its own risks: excess inventory, storage costs, spoilage, or overexposure if tariffs are rolled back. Others might become more cautious with purchase orders, reducing volumes to avoid being locked into high-cost goods.
Final Margin Squeeze
Even if tariffs aren’t initially applied broadly to food products, the domino effects of trade escalation, higher costs for packaging, transportation, and inputs, can still ripple through the spice chain. A sudden tariff on a niche Chinese chemical additive used in flavorings, or a logistics fee on Chinese shipping lines, could trickle down.
In sum, spice importers must view this situation not as a distant diplomatic spat but as a real commercial risk. Sharp cost increases, supply disruption, and forced sourcing shifts could all eat into profits or push up retail prices—and while many eyes are on tech and electronics, the humble spice could be an early casualty.
Conclusion
What looked a few weeks ago like a fragile détente between Washington and Beijing now threatens to unravel. Trump’s 100 % tariff threat and China’s warnings of retaliation revive memories of a brutal trade war. As both sides reposition, several sectors stand to feel the pain—not least among them the spice trade.
For Chinese spice exporters, the new tension could mean sudden loss of competitiveness. For U.S. importers, especially those who rely on Chinese garlic, ginger, and related products, the cost shock may come relatively fast. In this volatile moment, the ability to pivot supply lines, hedge purchases, and react nimbly may be the difference between loss and survival.
References
Chen, B. (2025). How U.S. tariffs impact China’s domestic sourcing [Abstract]. ScienceDirect. ScienceDirect
Equitable Growth. (2025). Tariffs impact U.S. industries differently, with manufacturing the most exposed. Equitable Growth
Hawkins, A. (2025, October 13). Why has the U.S.–China trade war restarted and how have markets reacted? The Guardian. The Guardian
Majestic Spice. (2025, February 3). New U.S. tariffs and their impact on the spice industry. majesticspice.com
Majestic Spice. (2025, March 4). The U.S. tariffs on Mexican, Canadian, and Chinese imports: What it means for the spice industry. majesticspice.com
Steinhoff, N. (n.d.). The impact of U.S. tariffs against China on U.S. imports (ECB Working Paper). European Central Bank
Trump tariffs: The economic impact of the Trump trade war. (n.d.). Tax Foundation. Fundación del Impuesto
Washington Post. (2025, October 11). Opinion: The U.S.–China trade war is back on. The Washington Post
“Breaking Down the U.S.–China Trade Tariffs: What’s in Effect Now.” (2025, September 30). China Briefing.